Cold Start Doctrine
What is Cold start doctrine?
·
In
conventional Military power, India
far superior than Pakistanis.
·
But
Paki got nuke bomb and proxy war tools. So conventional military power faces
some limitations.
·
So,
India
developed “cold start” offensive doctrine- it is not ‘official’ but experts
believe it exists.
·
Cold
start doctrine involves following:
Ø Limited BUT Precise strikes
in enemy state to prevent (nuclear) retaliation.
Ø Capture small but strategic
territories in Pakistan-
which can be traded for concessions later on.
Why Cold Start?
·
Cold
start saves a country from the limitations of conventional military
mobilization or “massed offensive doctrine”.
Let’s understand with “Operation Parakram”
·
Dec
13, 2001: Terrorists attack Indian Parliament. Indian responds with “Operation
Parakram”- full military mobilization at border for 10 months from January to
October 2002.
Operation Parakram: Full
military deployment
|
|
Good
|
Bad
|
Boosted
morale of army
|
Took almost a month to mobilize entire army. Such
time-lag helps Enemy approach UN or foreign ally for help and reinforcements.
|
Terrorist infiltration declined significantly, due
to heavy military presence at border.
|
|
Pak sponsored terrorism came under international
media scrutiny
|
Godhara riots (2002) opened a new front and
|
|
|
|
|
Moral of the story
·
Coercive
diplomacy and full military mobilization are not the perfect tools for Indo-Pak
situation.
·
Cold
start / surgical strikes / punitive actions are ideal tools against Pakis.
·
2004:
Indian army has adopted “limited war doctrine”.
·
Though
India
doesn’t officially acknowledge cold start doctrine but recent military exercise
prove that it exists- for example: Operation Vijayee Bhava (2011), Operation
Sudarshan Shakti (2011).
Cold Start: Benefits/ pro-arguments
·
Stops
enemy from nuclear attack.
·
Creates
an operation tempo- once Cold start begins, Political leaders can’t halt it.
·
Completes
Indian objective before UN/USA/international community intervenes.
Cold start: limitations / anti arguments
·
To
counter India ’s
Cold start, Pakis will develop small and portable nuke weapons because they can
be transported / hidden easily.
·
But
given ISI-nexus, terrorists can grab such weapons.
·
Then
it’ll be far more difficult to stop nuke attacks on Indian cities.
·
After
26/11/2008 attack on Mumbai , India did not launch cold start attack on Pakistan . Two
interpretation:
à Cold start is “Theoretical
exercise”, and Real world application will either fail or give mixed result,
hence Government did not try. OR
à Without political will, no
doctrine can succeed.
·
Point
4 leads to next limitation: Cold start only envisages “what we will do” but
there is no plan on : “when we will do it?” e.g. after ___ no. of Indians are
killed by a single terrorist attack /ceasefire violation, then we’ll definitely
erase all nuclear facilities in Pakistan .
·
Some
experts believe India ’s
Cold Start doctrine is “army-centric” because the three Indian defense services
don’t have robust ‘joint-structures’ for coordination. So, in real-life
scenario, Cold-start will be a fail.
=============================================
No comments:
Post a Comment