The Supreme Court’s verdict on the Cauvery dispute has
its share of positive features for Tamil Nadu, despite the State’s allocation
being cut by 14.75 thousand million cubic feet (tmc).
· From the State’s
point of view, the most important aspect of the court order is the recognition
of the plea for the establishment of the Cauvery Management Board. The Supreme
Court ordered the Centre to constitute the Board within six weeks. The court
also said that, “no extension shall be granted for framing of the scheme on any
ground”. This carry enormous meaning for Tamil Nadu as it is for the creation
of an implementation mechanism that a scheme has to be formulated. Ever since
the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT) gave its interim order in June 1991
and final order in February 2007, the State had sought the creation of a body
to ensure effective implementation of the order. After the publication of the
final order in the gazette of the Central government in February 2013, the
demand had grown louder.
· Unambiguous message
with regard to the schedule of release of water. The Court said that, the
need-based monthly release has to be respected. The court has appreciated the
position of the Tamil Nadu government, which had, over the years, complained
that Karnataka was not adhering to the schedule of water release, as worked out
by the tribunal in the interim order or final order.
· Another feature in
T.N.’s favour is the assertion by the court on the issue of irrigated area. It
not only left intact the extent of irrigated area (24.71 lakh acres), as
permitted by the tribunal in the final order, but also emphatically made it
clear that “the final determination of irrigated area arrived at by the
Tribunal for Tamil Nadu cannot be declared incorrect or fallacious.”
No comments:
Post a Comment