Followers

Showing posts with label British India. Show all posts
Showing posts with label British India. Show all posts

Oct 24, 2015

[History] Government of India Acts

Government of India Acts

The history of constitutional development in India begins from the passing of the Regulating Act in 1773. The Pitt’s India Act of 1784 and the successive Charter Acts from 1793 to 1853 form part of the constitutional changes under the East India Company’s rule.

Acts
Important Provisions




Government of India Act, 1858
'East India' Company’s rule came to an end. Indian administration came under the direct control of the Crown
In England, the Court of Directors and Board of Control were abolished. In their place came the Secretary of State and Indian Council. The Secretary of State would be a member of the British Cabinet. Sir Charles Wood was made the first Secretary of State for India. India Council consisting of 15 members would assist him.
The Governor General of India was also made the Viceroy of India. The first Viceroy of India was Lord Canning.



Indian Councils Act, 1861
It introduced for the first time the representative institutions in India
Increased the number of members in the Governor General’s executive Council from 4 to 5.
A provision was made for the inclusion of Indians in the Legislative Council. (Not possessed powers of administration and finance)
Legislative councils were also established in the provinces.


Indian Council Act, 1892
Introduced the principle of elections but in an indirect manner; I achievement of INC
The members were allowed to discuss the budget and criticize the financial policy of the government
Increased the number of members in the Governor General’s executive Council- not to be less than 10 and not to be more than 16.

  













Indian Council Act, 1909
Also called as Minto-Morley Reforms of 1909. (Lord Morley – Secretary State for India & Lord Minto – Governor-General of India)
It was passed to win the support of Moderates in the Congress; it changed the name of the Central Legislative Council to Imperial Legislative Council
The number of “additional members” of the Central Legislative Council was increased to a maximum of 60
Elected members were to be 27
Principle of election to the councils was legally recognized
Communal representation was introduced for first time in the interests of Muslims (Lord Minto: Father of Communal Electorates)
Separate electorates  were  provided  for  Muslims
(ultimately led to the partition of India in 1947)
The number of members in provincial legislative councils of major provinces was raised to 50
The Councils were given right to discuss and pass resolutions on the Budget and on all matters of public interest. However, the Governor-General has the power to disallow discussion on the budget
An Indian member was appointed for the first time to the Governor-General’s Executive Council. S. P. Sinha was the first Indian to appointed.
Two Indians were also appointed to the Indian Council in England
Never desired to set up a parliamentary form of government in India

  


   






Government of India Act, 1919
Also called as Montague-Chelmsford Reforms of 1919
Dyarchy was introduced in the Provinces. (Division of Powers)
A Bicameral legislature was set up at the centre. It consists of Council of States and the Legislative Assembly. The total member on the Legislative Assembly was to be maximum of 145 (out of which 105 were to be elected and the remaining nominated). In the Council of States, there would be a maximum of 60 members (out of which 34 were elected and the remaining are nominated)
The salaries of the Secretary of State for India and his assistants were to be paid out of the British revenues
A High Commissioner for India at London was appointed
The Act introduced, for the first time, bicameralism and direct elections in the country








Government of India Act, 1935
Passed on the basis of the report of Simon Commission, the outcome of the Round Table Conferences and the White paper issued by the British government in 1933
Provision for the establishment of an All India Federation at the centre, consisting of the Provinces of British India and the Princely States (It did not come into existence since the Princely States refused to give their consent for the union)
Division of powers into three lists: Federal, Provincial and Concurrent
Introduction of Dyarchy at the Centre.
Abolition of Dyarchy and the Introduction of Provincial Autonomy in the Provinces.
Provincial Legislatures of Bengal, Madras, Bombay, United Provinces, Bihar and Assam were made bicameral
Extension of the principles of Separate Electorates to Sikhs, Europeans, Indian Christians and Anglo Indians
Establishment of a Federal Court at Delhi with a Chief Justice and 6 Judges



=========================================

Sep 29, 2015

[History] Charter Acts

Charter Acts

There are five Charter Acts and each has its own significance. After the revolt of 1857, form 1858, these changed into as Council of Acts.

#
Year
Noted for


I


1773
Established Supreme Court at Fort William (Calcutta)
Designated the Governor of Bengal as the Governor-General of Bengal. Lord Warren Hastings was the first Governor-General of Bengal.
It subordinated the Governors of Bombay and Madras to the Governor-General of Bengal


II


1784
Pitt’s India Act 1784
Was named after the then British Prime Minister
Placed the Indian affairs under the direct control of the British Government
Established a Board of Control over the Court of Directors
III
1793
More representatives of Indians

IV

1813
Rs. 1 lakh allotted for education
Company trade monopoly came to an end except tea and trade with China



V



1833
It made the Governor-General of Bengal as the Governor-General of India. Lord William Bentinck – the first Governor-General of India.
This was the final step towards centralization in the British India
The Act ended the activities of the East India Company as commercial body.
Complete end of company’s monopoly trade including tea and trade with China
Abolish slavery

VI

1853
Open competitive for civil services introduced
The legislative and executive functions of the Governor-General’s Council were separated 



=========================================

Oct 22, 2014

[CA/Hist] Thuggee in British India

Current Affairs
Thuggee in British India

Why British India Thuggee in Current Affairs section now?
·        In September 2014, The Hindu review of a book “Thuggee: Banditry and the British in Early Nineteenth-Century India” by Kim A. Wagner.

Thuggee in British India
Famous Person Vs Thugs
Hiuen Tsang
Bandits attacked his caravan near Ganges. Wanted to sacrifice him to their goddess. (7th Cent)
Jalaluddin Khilji
Expelled ~1000 thugs from Delhi (1920)
Kabir
Used thugs as metaphors to show God’s deceit.
Nanak
His Janamsakhi texts also mention thuggary.
Augrangzeb
Ordered execution of Phansigar.
           
Who were these thugs?
·        Roamed on highways. Trapped victims with drug-laced laddu, looted their belongings and murdered.
·        Main targets: Company sepoys, merchants and pilgrims.
·        Looted horses and weapons given to local rulers for “protection”, and even bribed the city officials.
·        Even used the loot, to repay their agriculture debt to Zamindars!
·        Thugs came From all strata of society. They were not limited to a single caste or religion.
·        Many of them were sepoys in Mughal army, who lost jobs under British Empire.
·        Thuggee was a “seasonal occupation”. They left the village after the autumn harvest (Oct-Nov) and returned June-July before the rains.
 
How did British wiped out Thugs?
1810
East India Company passed a regulation. If Zamindar did not inform the company about thug activities, he’d be punished.
1830
Government authorised Captain Sleeman to wipe out thugs.
1839
Captain Sleeman succeeded but jailing and hanging most of the thugs.

Maharaja Nandakumar: 1st Whistleblower of British India
·        He was a revenue officer under the Nawab of Bengal
·        Helped British during Battle of Plassey (1757)


  
Year 1775
Nandakumar
Made allegations that Governor General Hastings accepted bribes from Nawab and others.
Hasting
No, Nandakumar himself paying bribes to others, to malign my image!

  • ·        Later, company officials arrange a ‘puppet’ Indian to file a forgery case against Nandakumar.
  • ·        During that era, Indian vs. Indian cases were not to be heard by British judges.
  • ·        But still a British judge presided over Nandakumar forgery case and awarded death sentence. (Curiously that judge was a close friend of Hastings)
  • ·        Maharaja Nandakumar was hanged in full public view at the Hoogly river banks near Kolkata.
  • ·        Edmund Burke, Lord Macaulay and other eminent British described Nandakumar’s hanging as a ‘judicial murder’.
  • ·        Moral of the story: unless there is a whistleblower protection act, you shouldn’t take on your boss.
  • ·        Why in news: His turban will be displayed in Kolkata’s Victoria’s hall.

 ==============================================