India has taken strong exception to the World Bank’s
“inexplicable” decision to set up a Court of Arbitration and appoint a Neutral
Expert to go into Pakistan’s complaint against it over Kishenganga and Ratle
hydroelectric projects in Jammu and Kashmir.
§ The Neutral Expert has been asked to go into Pakistan’s complaint
against India on the Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects in Jammu and
Kashmir.
Background:
While India had asked for a neutral expert to be appointed over
Pakistan’s objections to the Kishenganga and Ratle dam projects first, Pakistan
appealed directly for a Court of Arbitration (CoA) to be set up as it claims
India has violated the 1960 Indus Water treaty.
What’s the issue?
Kishengaga is a tributary of the river Jhelum and the project is
coming up in Bandipora.
§ Pakistan argues that the project cannot be built in a way that
will divert the river tributary. Its case was rejected by a Court of
Arbitration in 2013.
§ The project is almost complete and was to be commissioned this
month.
§ Pakistan also has objections on the Ratle project on the river
Chenab in Doda district; it wants the water storage capacity to be reduced
drastically, saying that the project will reduce the river flow into Pakistan.
What India says?
Surprised at the World Bank’s decision to appoint a Neutral
Expert, as sought by the Indian government and at the same time establish a
Court of Arbitration as wanted by Pakistan, India says proceeding with both the
steps simultaneously “legally untenable”.
Also, India has made it clear that it cannot be party to actions
which are not in accordance with the Indus Waters Treaty. The government has
said that it will examine further options and take steps accordingly.
Background:
Under the Indus Waters Treaty, signed between India and Pakistan
and also the World Bank in 1960, the World Bank has a specified role in the
process of resolution of differences and disputes.
No comments:
Post a Comment