Followers

Showing posts with label Committee. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Committee. Show all posts

May 10, 2020

[CA] Rangarajan Committee


Tamil Nadu government has constituted a 24-member high-level committee, headed by former RBI governor C Rangarajan, to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on different sectors of the economy. Finance Secretary S Krishnan will be the coordinator of the committee, which will submit its report to the government within three months. 

The panel will assess the impact of the lockdown, additional costs and implication due to social distancing, and precautionary measures to be undertaken. The panel will also come up with measures to help the important sectors of the economy overcome the pandemic, while assessing the impact of the crisis on the State government’s fiscal situation.
The panel will identify fiscal issues, and points to be taken up with the Centre for necessary action. In February, Deputy Chief Minister Mr. O Paneerselvam announced that an expert committee would be set up to improve tax to GSDP ratio of the State. Now, taking the pandemic into account, the role of the committee has been redefined. The State government is facing a shortfall of Rs. 10,000 crore due to the lockdown.     
Of the 24 members, 10 are from the government and 14 are field experts.
C. Rangarajan Committee
S. No
Members
Posts
01
Mr. S. Krishnan
(Coordinator)
Finance Secretary
02
Mr. N. Narayananan
Former Chief Secretary
03
Mr. P. Duraisamy
Vice – Chancellor, Madras University
04
Mr. N. Kumar
Vice – Chancellor, TN Agricultural University
05
Mr. K. Shanmugam
Director, Madras School of Economics
06
Mr. P. G. Babu
Director, MIDS
07
Mr. A. Vellayan
Former Chairman, Murugappa Groups
08
Mr. N. Srinivasan
Managing Director, Madras Cements
09
Mr. Venu Srinivasan
Chairman, TVS Motors
10
Mrs. Padmaja Chundru
Managing Director, Indian Bank
11
Mr. P. N. Vasudevan
Managing Director, Equitas Bank
12
Mr. M. Govinda Rao
Member, 14th Finance Commission
13
Mr. M. Suresh Babu
Professor, IIT Madras
14
Mr. Pinaki Chakraborty
UNICEF Coordinator

Jan 13, 2019

[CA] Umesh Sinha Committee


The Committee constituted under the chairmanship of Sr. Deputy Election Commissioner Umesh Sinha to review and suggest modifications and changes in the provisions of the Section 126 and other sections of the Representation of the People Act 1951, provisions of Model Code of Conduct and any other ECI instruction in this regard has submitted its report to the Commission.
The task of maintaining campaign silence during last 48 hours before the conclusion of polling is becoming increasingly onerous in the light of the increasing influence of digital media. So, apart from the regulation by law and ECI instructions, the resolve, proactive support and sustained effort by all stake holders which include political parties, media, civil society organizations, academia and educational institutions, the youth and citizens at large, will remain necessary to contain the evil impact.
The Committee had the following scope of work:
(a) Study and examine the present provisions of the Section 126 and other related Sections of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and identify difficulties/critical gaps to regulate the violation of the said provisions of the act, particularly during the prohibitory period of 48 hours before the completion of the poll, mentioned in section 126 and suggest necessary amendment/modification.
(b) Examine the type, category or growth of communication technology or media platform in the country and difficulties in regulating these media platforms during multiphase election when prohibitory period of 48 hours are in force.
(c) Impact of new media platforms and social media during the prohibitory period of 48 hours before the close of poll and its implication in view of the provisions of section 126.
(d) Examine the present provisions of Model Code of Conduct (MCC) related to the above issues and suggest modification in this regard.

Dec 26, 2018

[CA/Econ] Y M Deosthalee Committee



The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had formed a high-level task force on public credit registry (PCR) for India. The task force was chaired by Y M Deosthalee.
The task force has suggested the registry should capture all loan information and borrowers be able to access their own history. Data is to be made available to stakeholders such as banks, on a need-to-know basis. Data privacy will be protected

Dec 3, 2016

[CA] Committee for Digital Payment

NITI Aayog has constituted a Committee of Chief Ministers representing different political parties to examine and promote the use of digital payment systems across the country.

The move is in line with the Government’s thinking to promote transparency, financial inclusion and a healthy financial ecosystem nationwide and to give a boost to the adoption of digital payments systems by people at the grass root levels and small businesses.




Committee to promote digital payment
Convener
Mr. Chandrababu Naidu, Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh
Members
(i) Mr. Naveen Patnaik, Chief Minister of Odisha
(ii) Mr. Shivraj Singh Chouhan, Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh
(iii) Mr. Pawan Kumar Chamling, Chief Minister of Sikkim
(iv) Mr. V. Narayanaswamy, Chief Minister of Puducherry
(v) Mr. Devendra Fadnavis, Chief Minister of Maharashtra
But Chief Minister of Puducherry opt out from this
Member Secretary
Mr. Amitabh Kant, CEO, NITI Aayog
Special Invitees
(i) Mr. Nandan Nilekani, former Chairman UIDAI
(ii) Mr. Janmejaya Sinha, Chairman, Boston Consulting Group
(iii) Mr. Rajesh Jain, Managing Director, netCORE
(iv) Mr. Sharad Sharma, Co-founder, iSPIRIT
(v) Dr. Jayant Varma, Professor (Finance), IIM (Ahmedabad)




Jun 21, 2016

[CA] T. S. R. Subramanian Committee Report

T. S. R. Subramanian Committee Report [New Education Policy]

A high-power committee headed by former Cabinet Secretary T.S.R. Subramanian, tasked with drawing a blueprint for a new national education policy, has recommended that the law that set up the higher education regulator University Grants Commission (UGC) be allowed to lapse. The committee recently submitted its report to the Ministry of Human Resource Development.


Why scrap UGC?
·       The report says that the UGC has been unable over the years to effectively implement its regulations aimed at ensuring the quality of higher education in the country. Hence, the UGC act should be allowed to lapse.
·       Widespread irregularities in grant of approval of institutions and courses were also found by the committee. Also, there are serious concerns about the quality of education provided by a large number of colleges/universities. But, UGC has failed in its responsibility to monitor standards of education in higher education institutions and it has not succeeded in ensuring this. Besides, the credibility of the UGC has been seriously dented by approvals given to a large number of sub-standard colleges and deemed universities



Alternative arrangement:

The panel has instead suggested an alternative arrangement for a pruned UGC. The UGC could be revamped, made considerably leaner and thinner, and could be the nodal point for administration of the proposed National Higher Education Fellowship Programme, without any other promotional or regulatory function.

Background:
An expert Committee headed by Hari Gautam recently had examined thoroughly the past, present and future role of UGC. The report is under examination by the Ministry. The report had concluded that the UGC does not have the adequate number of personnel, of requisite quality, to be an effective regulatory force in the higher education sector.

Important recommendations made by the Subramanian committee:
·       An Indian Education Service (IES) should be established as an all India service with officers being on permanent settlement to the state governments but with the cadre controlling authority vesting with the Human Resource Development (HRD) ministry.
·       The outlay on education should be raised to at least 6% of GDP without further loss of time.
·       There should be minimum eligibility condition with 50% marks at graduate level for entry to existing B.Ed courses. Teacher Entrance Tests (TET) should be made compulsory for recruitment of all teachers. The Centre and states should jointly lay down norms and standards for TET.
·       Compulsory licensing or certification for teachers in government and private schools should be made mandatory, with provision for renewal every 10 years based on independent external testing.
·       Pre-school education for children in the age group of 4 to 5 years should be declared as a right and a programme for it implemented immediately.

·       The no detention policy must be continued for young children until completion of class V when the child will be 11 years old. At the upper primary stage, the system of detention shall be restored subject to the provision of remedial coaching and at least two extra chances being offered to prove his capability to move to a higher class.
·       On-demand board exams should be introduced to offer flexibility and reduce year end stress of students and parents. A National Level Test open to every student who has completed class XII from any School Board should be designed.
·       The mid-day meal (MDM) program should now be extended to cover students of secondary schools. This is necessary as levels of malnutrition and anaemia continue to be high among adolescents.
·       Top 200 foreign universities should be allowed to open campuses in India and give the same degree which is acceptable in the home country of the said university.

About University Grants Commission (UGC):
·       The University Grants Commission (UGC) of India is a statutory body set up in 1956, and is charged with coordination, determination and maintenance of standards of higher education.
·       It provides recognition to universities in India, and disburses funds to such recognized universities and colleges.
·       Previously, UGC was formed in 1946 to oversee the work of the three Central Universities of Aligarh, Banaras and, Delhi. In 1947, the Committee was entrusted with the responsibility of dealing with all the then existing Universities.

·       After independence, the University Education Commission was set up in 1948 under the Chairmanship of S. Radhakrishnan and it recommended that the UGC be reconstituted on the general model of the University Grants Commission of the United Kingdom.
The UGC was however, formally established in November 1956, by an Act of Parliament as a statutory body of the Government of India

May 4, 2016

[CA] Important Committees in 2016 [Jan - April]

Important Committees / Panel / Commission in News in 2016


Committee
Purpose
Shyam Benegal
For holistic interpretation of the provisions of the Cinematograph Act / Rules
Kamlesh Chandra
To review pay structure and socials ecurity benefits provided to Gramin Dak Sevaks
Just R M Lodha
For reforms in BCCI
Arvind Panagariya
For fast track bullet trains in India
P K Sinha
To process the recommendations of the Seventh Pay Commission
R V Easwar
To simplify Income Tax Act, 1961
Anil R Dave
To investigate the living conditions and salary structure of over 3 lakh nurses employed in private hospitals
Tapan Roy
To examining and making recommendations on changing  the Companies Act, 2013
Deepak Naik
To revive River Godavari


T S R Subramanian
New Education Policy
Shankar
To examine the possibility of replacing multiple prior permissions with pre – existing regulatory mechanism
Amit Mitra
To examine GST
S N Jha
To probe the sequence of event leading to violence during the Jat agitation in Northern India
Ashok Lahiri
To interact with the trade and industry on the imposition of Central Excise duty on jewellery
Ashok Dalwai
To make a blueprint for doubling farmer’s income by 2022
J C Divakar Reddy
To tackle misleading advertising as well as to fix liability on endorsers / celebrities
Madhur Gupta
To suggest ways to strengthen security along Indo-Pak border
R. M. Lodha
To reform the MCI (Medical Council of India)